Skip to main content

ThorLabs Automatic Mirror Aligner Setup

For a project we are working on we invested in a ThorLabs KPA101 Position Aligner and a very sexy looking piezo actuated mirror mount as well as some other bits and pieces to make it work. Check out the photos below! In any case, we were hoping for an easy setup but it turned out to not be so easy...

This post documents the configuration and my experience with the (very expensive) equipment.

The Equipment:

The piezo actuated (2-axis) mirror mount with beam-splitter and quadrant photodetector in the background.


As you may have noticed from the photos, but we are using the following equipment:
  • KPA101 Position Aligner (basically just 2 PID controllers with photodiode inputs and -10 to +10V outputs)
  • Two KPZ101 Piezo Controllers (one for each axis of the mirror)
  • Polaris K1PZ2 mirror mount
  • PDQ80A Quadrant Photodiode (the controller tries to keep the beam centred on this)
  • Two SMB to BNC cables (ThorLabs provides these with the mount)
  • Two BNC to SMC adaptors (to connect the BNC to the Piezo Controller... more on this below)
  • Two SMA to SMA cables (to connect the aligner to the controllers)
  • Power supplies
Irritatingly, after we bought all the bits, at no insignificant expense, we found that although ThorLabs supplies cables, for some random reason the HV out on the Piezo Controllers is actually a fairly exotic SMC connector! There was no mention of the fact that one would need an adaptor by default to make this work (yes, we should have realised... before we were in the lab hooking it up). The adaptor is around $50 which is pretty steep, although we found one at Farnell/RS/Mouser for less and so we bought two there instead.

The Configuration:

We were hoping that everything would be relatively "plug and play" but unfortunately this wasn't the case.

The outputs of the position aligner PID controller are bipolar, -10 to +10V, proportional to how far the mirror should move on each axis to get the beam centred on the detector. Of course, centred means that the optical intensity in each quadrant is equal so one should ensure the beam is symmetrical. A fairly simple mechanism which one could achieve with an Arduino and some trans-impedance amplifiers if time was of no importance ;)

The outputs simply hook up to the piezo controllers. This is where the problem comes in. IMO the product managers at ThorLabs need to seriously rethink at this: the inputs of the piezo controllers are 0 to 10V. See the issue? There is no easy way to get a 5V offset, or to force the position aligner to output 0 to 10V centred on 5V, or some other compromise to make it work well. Basically, the beam can be controlled to move down and left. Right and up would also be handy, right? Well... the controller outputs a negative voltage for that, and the controllers don't know what to do with a negative voltage.

Our solution (for now) is to make sure the beam starts of slightly misaligned in tho top right quadrant on the detector so that there is an approximately 5V artificial bias on things. This way when there is some wobble, there is some range to correct in any direction.

For reference, these are the settings we used:

The top image is the open loop "default" config where we have set the inputs of the controllers to be from the external SMA which is fed by the aligner. Notice how the beam is initially positioned in the top right quadrant. Below, the beam is well centred by the controller at about 5V.
The position aligners PID settings are controllable from the PC application via USB. The defaults worked, but the control was very slow but stable. We are hoping to use the system for tip-tilt correction in a free space comms link and so we need it to be quite fast. We settled on the following values: P=1.0, I = 0.5, D = 0.5. This seems to be stable with no overshoot or oscillation that is significant to our application. I'm sure it can be improved upon. I will update this post if I do so.

We also set the y direction to be reversed since the input from the quadrant photodiode is reversed. This is documented by ThorLabs.

Conclusion

All in all, the controller seems to work well. There are some irritations when using it and the initial alignment in a system will be quite difficult because of the fact that negative control outputs don't work. With my custom PID settings the beam converges to the centre from the position shown in the photo above in half a second or so. Hopefully this works for our application!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Custom VCSEL Bias Driver

I have been working on a laser diode bias driver for a while now, in line with my latest research project. ThorLabs recently released some great looking bias driver "chip" things, the MLD203 series. I felt that I could use these on a custom board to modulate laser diodes and VCSELs using my USRPs.


In the image above (and below) you can see the two red PCBs which I have designed and constructed. The bias driver (left) connects with an SMA connector to a Bias-T from Mini-Circuits to to TO-Can laser diode adaptor PCB which is visible on the right. I have designed everything to be low noise and high frequency compatible.


Unfortunately, I made a mistake with the laser diode footprint and so I had to mount it upside down! I soldered a SMD capacitor at the point where the little red wire connects to the diode to minimise adverse high frequency effects.



Check out the Git repo for this and more: https://github.com/ManCaveMade/LDBiasDriver

Simulink 2x1 MIMO Channel Estimation Test

I have been working on a MATLAB Simulink based Alamouti testbed for USRP software defined radio. I am using the Ettus B210.

I have implemented a very simplistic channel estimation scheme whereby I transmit each of the four QPSK constellation points on each antenna consecutively. I then receive using a single antenna, and after all of the frequency and phase synchronisation I divide what was received by the ideal constellation leading to a simple H-matrix.

Check out this video where you can see the pilot constellation change as I move the antenna! Awesome!


Aligning an LG Mode Sorter

The so-called "mode sorter" is a great optical device that allows for easy separation of Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes [Berkhout2010]. Combined LG modes, which contain Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) are input to the one end of the mode sorter and on the other end they are output as "spots" which can be detected with a camera, fibre array, etc. This naturally has many uses in optical communications and physics in general.

I have been working with one of these devices and since the alignment is very tricky, I felt that it would be useful to document it here for my own reference and hopefully that of others!

The first thing to make absolutely sure of is the incoming beams' level. This beam must be perfectly parallel to the axis of the mode sorter, otherwise getting the alignment right after the installation of the mode sorter is close to impossible. I find it useful to mount the mode sorter in a pair of lens mounts. Before installing the sorter, use one of the mount…